Litigation Law Newsletter, Volume 1, Number 3: COVID-19
Click “Subscribe Now” to get attorney insights on the latest developments in a range of services and industries.
March Focus
COVID-19
With all that is going on in the world, I wanted to provide you with a few key things to keep in mind regarding employers and employees.
As an employer, it is your duty to ensure that the workplace is safe. Although most businesses have been shutting down, the law as it currently stands does not prevent all businesses in Ontario from continuing to operate. Therefore, if you are continuing to operate, please keep the following in mind as an employer:
- Require employees returning from a high-risk area to immediately report such travel as well as any symptoms. Require such employees to work remotely for 14 days and only return once cleared by a medical professional.
- While layoffs are unfortunate and sad, be careful not to trigger constructive dismissals (i.e., making a substantial change to the terms of the employee’s contract without the employee’s consent, the employee has the option of treating his employment as having been terminated).
- Take the appropriate steps to ensure privacy of medical and health information.
- Consider that employees with a legitimate health and safety work refusal cannot be disciplined or dismissed.
Of late, the question that keeps arising is what happens if an employee refuses to attend the workplace because he fears that it poses a danger to his health and safety, even though the employee is not sick?
For starters, this situation is unprecedented. The legislation with the most applicability to the current situation is the Occupational Health and Safety Act (“the Act”). Under the Act, an employee can refuse to work if he believes the workplace poses a danger to his health or safety. Occupational illness is defined as a condition that results from exposure in a workplace to a physical, chemical, or biological agent to the extent that the normal physiological mechanisms are affected and the health of the worker is impaired. Occupational illness might include exposure to disease-causing bacteria and viruses, for example, or to chemicals or dust.
Until now, we are unaware of any worker who has attempted to rely on the Act as a basis for refusing to attend work because of COVID-19. However, with the current predicament changing rapidly, it won’t be long before this argument is made to the Courts on an urgent basis.
Contacts
Recent Insights
- January 2, 2025 In the News Four Dickinson Wright Lawyers Recognized in Who’s Who Legal Canada 2024
- January 2, 2025 In the News Andre Poles Recognized in Who’s Who Legal Private Funds 2025 Guide
- December 31, 2024 Industry Alerts Fifth Circuit Reinstates CTA Injunction, FinCEN Still Accepting Voluntary Filings
- December 27, 2024 Media Mentions Jeffrey Kass was recently quoted in the BusinessDen article “Lakewood company says biased BBB leads public to think it's government.”
- December 24, 2024 Industry Alerts Fifth Circuit Reverses CTA Injunction, Deadline Extended
- December 24, 2024 Media Mentions Lee Petro was recently interviewed by Pulse 2.0 in the segment “Dickinson Wright: Interview With Partner Lee Petro About Communications Law.”
- December 23, 2024 Media Mentions Mark Wilson was recently featured in the Crain's Detroit Business segment, “Notable Nonprofit Board Leaders 2024.”
- December 20, 2024 In the News Alex Crandall’s article, “Justices Mull Sex-Based Classification In Trans Law Case,” was recently published in Law360.
- December 20, 2024 Media Mentions Kathleen Campbell Walker was recently quoted in the TechTarget article, “Experts brace for tougher H-1B crackdown in Trump's new term,”