Lawyer Jacob Frenkel Quoted in New York Law Journal Article on SEC Administrative Law Judges
- Frenkel, Jacob S. .
- Media Mentions
Want to get our alerts?
Click “Subscribe Now” to get attorney insights on the latest developments in a range of services and industries.
Washington, D.C. Lawyer Jacob Frenkel recently was quoted in the article “Ruling May Tee-Up Power of SEC ALJs for High Court Review,” published by the New York Law Journal, regarding the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit’s decision in Bandimere v. U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission.
The decision declared that the way the SEC appoints Administrative Law Judges violates the Constitution and sets up a clean split among the circuits and may implicate the validity of administrative proceedings in other areas of government. The decision is in direct conflict with the D.C. Circuit’s decision in Lucia v. SEC and may find its way to the U.S. Supreme Court later this year for review.
“The appointments clause issue is fixable and it’s reasonable to expect that the Supreme Court is not going to permit years of ALJ decisions, let alone decisions upheld by the full commission, to fall on a technical issue,” Frenkel told the New York Law Journal. “It would be far more meaningful for these cases to address the more significant issue of prejudice and these modest, prophylactic fixes that the commission embraces as concession do not go far enough to protect the rights of defendants.”
To read the full article, please click here.
The decision declared that the way the SEC appoints Administrative Law Judges violates the Constitution and sets up a clean split among the circuits and may implicate the validity of administrative proceedings in other areas of government. The decision is in direct conflict with the D.C. Circuit’s decision in Lucia v. SEC and may find its way to the U.S. Supreme Court later this year for review.
“The appointments clause issue is fixable and it’s reasonable to expect that the Supreme Court is not going to permit years of ALJ decisions, let alone decisions upheld by the full commission, to fall on a technical issue,” Frenkel told the New York Law Journal. “It would be far more meaningful for these cases to address the more significant issue of prejudice and these modest, prophylactic fixes that the commission embraces as concession do not go far enough to protect the rights of defendants.”
To read the full article, please click here.
Contacts

Jacob Frenkel
Member and Chair of Government Investigations & Securities Enforcement
Washington, D.C.
Recent Insights
- March 12, 2025 In the News Brian Yu Joins Dickinson Wright Washington, D.C. Office
- March 11, 2025 In the News Three Dickinson Wright Lawyers Recognized in Chambers Global Guide 2025
- March 11, 2025 Media Mentions Kathleen Campbell Walker was recently quoted in the Newsweek article, “What to Know About the H-1B Program: Pros, Cons and Hiring Alternatives.”
- March 10, 2025 In the News Starlyn Endres Joins Dickinson Wright Phoenix Office
- March 10, 2025 Media Mentions K. Lance Anderson was recently quoted in the MJ Biz Daily article, “Could 2025 be the year of university and cannabis industry partnerships?”
- March 07, 2025 In the News The Baltimore Sun recently published Venroy July’s article, “Maryland dropped the ball on Opportunity Zone tax incentives.”
- March 06, 2025 Industry Alerts U.S. Treasury Department Suspends Enforcement of Corporate Transparency Act for U.S. Citizens and U.S. Companies
- March 5, 2025 In the News Eric McDonough Joins Dickinson Wright San Diego Office
- March 5, 2025 In the News Ramey Orow Joins Dickinson Wright Troy Office