Trade-Marks in Canada: Processing of Applications
- Bain, Paul E.
- Industry Alerts
Click “Subscribe Now” to get attorney insights on the latest developments in a range of services and industries.
The Office of the Registrar of the Canadian Intellectual Property Office (“CIPO”) processes applications for trade-mark registration based on the steps below. All the time-frames are approximate.
1. Formalities
Once an application is filed and in good order, along with the applicable fee ($250 if submitted online), CIPO assigns a filing date and an application number to the application and opens a file.
The application will be entered into the Canadian Trade-marks Database as well as other databases maintained by external companies. The application is labeled “
‘Pending.’
CIPO will provide a formal Filing Acknowledgement and a proof sheet listing the information included in the application. These documents should be reviewed carefully and clients should advise immediately if there are any errors or omissions. If the application is correct and complete, the acknowledgement and proof sheet will be sent by CIPO within ten (10) days after the application is filed.
2. Examination
A trade-mark examiner will review the application and determine if the trade-mark can be approved for advertisement in the Trade-marks Journal. If there are any doubts about the application, the examiner will notify of the objections. The applicant’s agent will then have an opportunity to respond. If the answers still fail to satisfy the examiner, CIPO will provide a letter informing that the application has been refused and explaining the reasons why. In the event of a refusal, there is a right of appeal to the Federal Court of Canada.
CIPO will send a formal Notice of Approval once the application is approved. If the application is approved without amendments, the Approval Notice should be mailed within six (6) months. If the application contains complex problems or issues, the examiner’s report should be mailed within six (6) months.
3. Advertising
If the application is approved, it will be published in one issue of the Trade-marks Journal, published weekly and available by subscription and in major libraries in Canada. Within two (2) months of being advertised, others can oppose the application, which will then be removed from normal processing until the opposition has been resolved.
The applicant will not be notified at this stage unless the application is opposed by one or more parties. In this event, the Trade-marks Opposition Board (“TMOB”) will provide written notification.
The application should appear in the Trade-marks Journal approximately five (5) weeks after it is approved.
4. Opposition
Should the application be opposed after being published in the Trade-marks Journal, the TMOB will forward a copy of the Statement of Opposition. Should the applicant contest the opposition, it will have one month to serve and file a counter statement. Both parties will, in turn, have an opportunity to file affidavit evidence and written arguments, as well as to make submissions at an oral hearing. If the opposition is withdrawn or is unsuccessful, the application will proceed to allowance.
An opposition is a complicated litigation-like proceeding. Most proceedings are resolved during the course of the opposition, but a complete opposition may last more than two (2) years.
5. Allowance
If there is no opposition, or if an opposition has been decided in favour of the applicant, the application will be allowed and the Office of the Registrar will not consider any further challenges. The applicant’s agent will receive a Notice of Allowance and be required to pay the $200 registration fee. If the application has been based on “proposed use,” the applicant may request an extension of time until the trade-mark is actually in use. There is a fee of $125 per extension.
If the applicant does not respond to the Notice of Allowance in the indicated time, abandonment steps may be taken.
If the application is not opposed, the Notice of Allowance should be mailed by CIPO three (3) months after the application appears in the Trade-marks Journal.
6. Registration
The applicant must pay the registration fee and, if the application was based on ‘proposed use,’ a Declaration stating that the trade-mark is being used must be provided. The trade-mark now moves from ‘Pending’ status and becomes a ‘Registered trade-mark’.
The official Certificate of Registration will be obtained and provided to the applicant/registrant.
The Certificate of Registration should be provided between three (3) to four (4) weeks after payment is made.
7. Conclusion
The length of time to register a trade-mark varies. If the application is filed correctly, approved without changes, and is not opposed, a Notice of Allowance should be received approximately 15 months after filing. After submitting the registration fee and Declaration of use (for trade-marks applications based on “proposed use”), the trade-mark should be registered about four (4) weeks later.
FOR MORE INFORMATION CONTACT:
Paul Bain, is a partner in Dickinson Wright’s Toronto office. He can be reached at 416.646.8364 or pbain@dickinsonwright.com.
This client alert is provided on an ‘as is’ basis and for general information purposes only. It should not be used as a substitute for, or construed as, specific legal advice. All liability is expressly disclaimed.
For a printable version of this trade-mark client alert, click here.
Related Practices
Contacts
Recent Insights
- Industry Alerts CIPO Pandemic Response and Canada’s New Compulsory Patent Licensing Provisions
- Industry Alerts Canadian Trademarks
- Industry Alerts CIPO Pandemic Response: Update April 28, 2020*
- November 21, 2024 Industry Alerts Get Ready for Changes to USPTO Trademark Proceedings and Fees in January 2025
- October 28, 2024 Media Mentions John Krieger was recently quoted in the Los Angeles Times article, "The ‘Baby Reindeer’ case against Netflix could hinge on one line: ‘This is a true story’,”
- October 14, 2024 Media Mentions The San Diego Business Journal has quoted both Michael Hammer and Dr. Jing Liu in the article, “Drawn to San Diego for Life Science Practice.”
- October 11, 2024 In the News Andrea Arndt's article, "Patent Owners Beware: Expanded Jurisdiction Risks in Using Third-Party Platforms to Remove Infringing Listings," was published by IP Watchdog.
- October 11, 2024 Media Mentions Mike Hammer and Dr. Jing Liu have been quoted in the Law360 article, “Why Dickinson Wright Launched IP-Focused San Diego Shop.”
- October 10, 2024 In the News Inbound Logistics published Tripp Lake's article titled, "Protecting Supply Chain Trade Secrets."