Litigation Law Newsletter, Volume 1, Number 4: Deposits for Home Purchases
Click “Subscribe Now” to get attorney insights on the latest developments in a range of services and industries.
April Focus
Deposits for Home Purchases
Whether you’re an owner selling your residence, or a buyer purchasing a residence, deposits are required. The deposit gives the vendor some measure of security in case of default by the buyer.
But what happens if a real estate transaction goes sideways? How does a party retrieve the deposit? The answer to this question is not as simple as it seems.
Retrieving the Deposit
Deposits are usually held by one of the party’s real estate agents, in trust. This means that unless there is a resolution between the parties or a court order, the real estate agent cannot release the funds under any circumstance. For example, suppose a vendor claims entitlement to a $100,000 deposit because of default by the buyer. The vendor cannot simply ask the real estate agent to release the funds from trust. Instead, the vendor must bring a court application unless the buyer consents to the release of the funds. However, given that litigation is expensive, often both parties will try to work out an arrangement in order to avoid expensive legal fees.
Settlement Is Usually Preferable
In Ontario, a successful party is generally only entitled to receive 60% of his legal costs from the other party. Thus, if a party incurs legal fees of $50,000 and was successful at court, the party who was unsuccessful at court would be responsible to pay the successful party $30,000, representing 60% of the $50,0000 incurred. Looking at it another way, the successful party will still have to pay $20,000 of his $50,000 legal expenses. Therefore, if a buyer defaults on his obligations under the contract, as in my example above, I would typically recommend the vendor to try and settle with the buyer for a minor amount to avoid the legal fees that would otherwise be lost. This would also allow the vendor to retrieve the funds much sooner than if he proceeded by way of a court application.
While I am hopeful that you will never find yourself in this spot, disputes arise often. It is important to know your options when things go off track so you can make the most of a difficult situation.
Wishing everyone is safe and healthy during these trying times.
Recent Insights
- March 07, 2025 In the News The Baltimore Sun recently published Venroy July’s article, “Maryland dropped the ball on Opportunity Zone tax incentives.”
- March 06, 2025 Industry Alerts U.S. Treasury Department Suspends Enforcement of Corporate Transparency Act for U.S. Citizens and U.S. Companies
- March 5, 2025 In the News Eric McDonough Joins Dickinson Wright San Diego Office
- March 5, 2025 In the News Ramey Orow Joins Dickinson Wright Troy Office
- March 04, 2025 Media Mentions Seth Waxman was recently quoted in the Moneylaundering.com article, “US Anti-Corruption Unit’s Demise Will Impact AML Programs.”
- March 03, 2025 Media Mentions James Plemmons was recently quoted in an article by The American Lawyer, “Law Firms 'Pull Back' on Hiring Fired Government Lawyers.”
- March 03, 2025 Media Mentions Kathleen Campbell Walker was recently quoted in the Snopes article, “Unpacking Trump Admin's Claim That 'All' Undocumented Immigrants Are Criminals.”
- February 26, 2025 In the News Sameeul Haque Joins Dickinson Wright Chicago Office
- February 26, 2025 In the News Luis Montanez Joins Dickinson Wright Las Vegas Office