Canada Reaches Comprehensive and Progressive Trans-Pacific Partnership Agreement
Download PDF- Industry Alerts
Want to get our alerts?
Click “Subscribe Now” to get attorney insights on the latest developments in a range of services and industries.
Introduction
On January 23, 2018, the Honourable François-Philippe Champagne, Minister of International Trade, announced that Canada had reached an agreement with Australia, Brunei, Chile, Japan, Malaysia, Mexico, New Zealand, Peru, Singapore and Vietnam for a Comprehensive and Progressive Trans-Pacific Partnership Agreement (“CP-TPP”). CP-TPP discussions formally began in late September as part of an effort to finalize a renewed Trans-Pacific trade agreement following the United States’ withdrawal from the initial Trans-Pacific Partnership Agreement (“TPP”). The TPP was a multi-lateral trade initiative between 12 countries and signed by all members on February 4, 2016. On January 30, 2017, however, following the election of President Trump, the United States notified signatories that it did not intend to become a party to the TPP.
The CP-TPP
The CP-TPP will be signed by all 11 members during a ceremony to be held in March in Chile.
Total merchandise trade among CP-TPP countries reached US$404 billion in 2015. Together, the 11 countries, including Canada, represent 494 million people, with a combined GDP of US$10.2 trillion, or 13.6 percent of global GDP. While significant, it is a drastic regression from the TPP, which would have covered about 40 percent of the world’s GDP with a combined GDP of US$28.5 trillion.
One holdover from the TPP for Canada is the existence of a bilateral arrangement with Japan which includes non-tariff barriers and a binding dispute settlement mechanism. Other bilateral agreements with Malaysia (on auto rules-of-origin) and Australia are expected to be finalized shortly. While the entire CP-TPP text is not yet available, it is believed that Canada protected its well-documented concerns over “cultural industries” (aka. Canadian media) through side letters.
The NAFTA Context
The CP-TPP signals the latest agreement signed by Canada in its efforts to expand and diversify its free trade network, particularly significant in light of its recent difficulties in negotiations with the United States and Mexico over a renewed North American Free Trade Agreement (“NAFTA”). Mexican and Canadian exports will now enjoy a competitive advantage over American exports to other CP-TPP partners following the progressive elimination of customs tariffs. It remains to be seen how other aspects of the CP-TPP will influence NAFTA negotiations and how differences between the CP-TPP and NAFTA will be reconciled as the sixth round of negotiations begin in Montreal.
The CP-TPP, along with the recently implemented Canada-European Union Comprehensive Economic and Trade Agreement, may provide Canada with the motive and the opportunity to move on from NAFTA and truly diversify its trade should the Trump Administration continue to maintain its hard line stance on demands that are deemed unacceptable by Canadian officials.
This client alert is published by Dickinson Wright PLLC/Dickinson Wright LLP to inform our clients and friends of important developments in the field of international trade law. The content is informational only and does not constitute legal or professional advice. We encourage you to consult a Dickinson Wright attorney if you have specific questions or concerns relating to any of the topics covered in here.
On January 23, 2018, the Honourable François-Philippe Champagne, Minister of International Trade, announced that Canada had reached an agreement with Australia, Brunei, Chile, Japan, Malaysia, Mexico, New Zealand, Peru, Singapore and Vietnam for a Comprehensive and Progressive Trans-Pacific Partnership Agreement (“CP-TPP”). CP-TPP discussions formally began in late September as part of an effort to finalize a renewed Trans-Pacific trade agreement following the United States’ withdrawal from the initial Trans-Pacific Partnership Agreement (“TPP”). The TPP was a multi-lateral trade initiative between 12 countries and signed by all members on February 4, 2016. On January 30, 2017, however, following the election of President Trump, the United States notified signatories that it did not intend to become a party to the TPP.
The CP-TPP
The CP-TPP will be signed by all 11 members during a ceremony to be held in March in Chile.
Total merchandise trade among CP-TPP countries reached US$404 billion in 2015. Together, the 11 countries, including Canada, represent 494 million people, with a combined GDP of US$10.2 trillion, or 13.6 percent of global GDP. While significant, it is a drastic regression from the TPP, which would have covered about 40 percent of the world’s GDP with a combined GDP of US$28.5 trillion.
One holdover from the TPP for Canada is the existence of a bilateral arrangement with Japan which includes non-tariff barriers and a binding dispute settlement mechanism. Other bilateral agreements with Malaysia (on auto rules-of-origin) and Australia are expected to be finalized shortly. While the entire CP-TPP text is not yet available, it is believed that Canada protected its well-documented concerns over “cultural industries” (aka. Canadian media) through side letters.
The NAFTA Context
The CP-TPP signals the latest agreement signed by Canada in its efforts to expand and diversify its free trade network, particularly significant in light of its recent difficulties in negotiations with the United States and Mexico over a renewed North American Free Trade Agreement (“NAFTA”). Mexican and Canadian exports will now enjoy a competitive advantage over American exports to other CP-TPP partners following the progressive elimination of customs tariffs. It remains to be seen how other aspects of the CP-TPP will influence NAFTA negotiations and how differences between the CP-TPP and NAFTA will be reconciled as the sixth round of negotiations begin in Montreal.
The CP-TPP, along with the recently implemented Canada-European Union Comprehensive Economic and Trade Agreement, may provide Canada with the motive and the opportunity to move on from NAFTA and truly diversify its trade should the Trump Administration continue to maintain its hard line stance on demands that are deemed unacceptable by Canadian officials.
This client alert is published by Dickinson Wright PLLC/Dickinson Wright LLP to inform our clients and friends of important developments in the field of international trade law. The content is informational only and does not constitute legal or professional advice. We encourage you to consult a Dickinson Wright attorney if you have specific questions or concerns relating to any of the topics covered in here.
Related Practices
Recent Insights
- Industry Alerts Canada Initiates Stakeholder Consultations on a New Trans-Pacific Partnership Agreement
- Industry Alerts Major Changes Coming to the Canadian Dairy Industry
- Webinars Vietnam and the Great Supply Chain Realignment
- September 24, 2024 Industry Alerts USTR Finalizes Modifications on Section 301 Tariffs: Starting September 27, 2024 | 美国贸易代表办公室发布对华301关税最终修改措施:一些关税上调将在2024年9月27日起生效
- September 12, 2024 Industry Alerts Plugged In: An EV Newsletter Vol. 2, No. 7
- July 09, 2024 Industry Alerts The Cost of a Trade War: Reflections from China and EVs Caught in the Cross-hairs 一 场贸易战的代价: 中国之行和电动汽车陷入的困境的一些反思
- June 26, 2024 In the News Mark Heusel and Hezi Wang's article, "Tariffs on Chinese Goods Target a New Sector of Concern," was recently published by Directors & Boards.
- May 14, 2024 Industry Alerts USTR to Take Further Actions on China 301 Tariffs
- February 05, 2021 Media Mentions Mark High Featured on UnpublishedTV to Discuss Canada-U.S. Relationship Under Biden